Was Syscoin [SYS] hacked? Team clarifies the recent confusion related to its trading activity

Home » News » Was Syscoin [SYS] hacked? Team clarifies the recent confusion related to its trading activity
July 6, 2018 by
Was Syscoin [SYS] hacked? Team clarifies the recent confusion related to its trading activity

On July 3, 2018, Syscoin tweeted discussing that irregular blockchain activity was noted from their side as well as they ask for the exchanges to halt all $SYS down payment or withdrawal for that day.

This triggered a lot of confusion in the community with conjectures about the hack. Records discussed that one billion Syscoin was extracted from a solitary block, despite the overall supply being around 888 million. In a current message on Tool, Syscoin team claimed that they take its protection very seriously and that’s why the short-lived cease on deposit/withdrawal from exchanges was introduced.

See additionally: Binance suspends trading, withdrawals and other account features

The team in the blog post discussed that Syscoin was not hacked, jeopardized or assaulted, as it was reported. As a matter of fact, the truth is “another thing entirely”. They launched Syscoin 3.0.6 around 10 days earlier. The post discussed, “The release was a necessary update taking care of a governance superblock charge computation insect. When a superblock with transaction fees was hit, it would not validate customers that hadn’t moved into the obligatory update.”

On July 3, a massive rise in the cost as well as trading volume of Syscoin was noted. Prior to the rate movements on Binance, their group detected big buy wall surfaces across exchanges and noticed some abnormalities. They saw that the blocks that are being refined were not including transactions consistently. Moreover, masternodes were ending with the mining trouble going down due to large miners not mining with their ASICs.

See additionally: The Exponential Growth of Syscoin (SYS) Smells Fishy: SYS Rate Analysis

A Superblock was developed at around 1:00 PM PST, as well as they specified that it was “anticipated and gotten ready for weeks in advance”, causing some miner nodes to stop. Post this, a number of huge mining swimming pools established cost policies that were greater than the coin’s default rate. So, the deals where the requirements were not completely satisfied, they came to be “backed up” in the mempool of the chain. Constant mining by the miners with lower fee prices with purchases being refined in sets, making it show up “larger than normal quantities of Syscoin to be negotiated in a solitary block”.

A mechanical engineer turned journalist, Shekar takes a keen interest in the study and analysis of cryptocurrencies and blockchain strategy. With the cryptocurrency world blooming in the recent days, he finds great interest in monitoring their growth and gathering every possible piece of information about them. He works as a crypto-journalist for the website Cryptoheed.

© Copyright 2018. Crypto Heed. Designed by Space-Themes.com.